Ken / Pat and friends. I have been reading both of your blogs for some time now and in spite of you...more
posted Friday, July 30, 2010 at 7:04pm PDT on Jennie Finch retires, but leaves her glitter and make-up behind
|
posted by Fair Game News Seeking equality on -- and off -- the field. The strong connection between organized athletics and power (political, economic, social) means sports have consequences far beyond the game. FairGameNews.com aims to challenge sex-stereotyped assumptions and practices that dominate sports -- and recognize that sports can be a tool for seeking equal treatment and fair play. |
|
|
|
|
By Laura Pappano
When Jonathan Hall captured the air-rifle individual title at the NCAA Rifle Championships, held at Texas Christian University last weekend, he realized what a big deal it was. “I had to represent the men,” said Hall, according to an NCAA news report. (Hall was the only guy to make the finals.)
The all-female TCU team won the overall NCAA national title and the team air-rifle title; Sarah Scherer of TCU won the small bore individual title.
While this was a big day for men — and for Columbia (Ga.) State, which just started a rifle team this year — it also serves as a reminder that men can compete in sports with top female athletes and sometimes win.
Or, put another way, in some sports men and women can compete with and against each other. No problem.
NCAA College Rifle is a co-ed sport. What makes this so interesting is that in Olympic competition, rifle is divided by sex. And not just divided, but assigned different rules.
In rifle, for example, there are some events women don’t compete in at all (sound familiar?) and others — like the 50m, 3 position (prone, standing kneeling) where the men take 40 shots and women just 20. In the 10m air rifle, guys take 60 shots standing; women 40 (same deal for the air pistol). Trap, double trap and skeet shooting call for 125 targets for men and 75, 120, and 75 (respectively) for women. But why?
Having different divisions and rules in an Olympic sport in which males and females already effectively compete together at the college level makes no sense. For those who argue that making Olympic shooting competition co-ed would cut down on chances for medals, I’d say: Make more categories.
In 1976 when Margaret Murdock “tied” for a gold medal with Lanny Basham and was awarded a silver by the judges, it was a co-ed competition — and then divided after that. “Men didn’t like having a woman beat them,” Murdock told me a few years ago in an interview.
Now, of course, they are used to it. Maybe the IOC can be out front here: There’s still time before London…
View Original Post at fairgamenews.com
|
|
|
|
MOST POPULAR POSTS
posted by One Sport Voice 02/05/10 at 12:44pm
posted by Chantelle Says 07/22/10 at 9:00pm
posted by MsAkiba 10/11/09 at 11:40am
posted by MarQFPR 07/25/10 at 5:11am
posted by Pat Griffin's LGBT Sport Blog 07/29/09 at 9:41am
posted by Bike Diva 10/08/09 at 12:49pm
posted by WTA Women's Tennis 10/07/09 at 12:14pm
posted by Pat Griffin's LGBT Sport Blog 07/21/10 at 2:21pm
posted by Wfighter 07/27/10 at 11:44pm
posted by AnnGaff 06/25/10 at 10:59pm
LATEST WTS POSTS
posted by All White Kit
Today at 4:20pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Today at 4:14pm
posted by C and R's Stanford Women's Basketball Blog
Today at 4:10pm
posted by SkaterGirl
Today at 10:40am
posted by Women's Sports Blog
Today at 9:21am
posted by Loree: A Skirt, A Hammer, A Life, and A Dream
Today at 9:16am
posted by Jayda Evans: Womens Hoops Blog
Today at 9:13am
posted by Title IX Blog
Fri at 6:47pm
posted by They're Playing Basketball
Fri at 6:46pm
posted by Swish Appeal
Fri at 6:34pm
No one has commented on this yet. Be the first!